After returning to the game eRevollution, a player named Abraham Linkon immediately took his seat in the armchair and started giving orders.

He even considered removing me from the White House residence, better known as the Discord channel, after I sent him a message through a congressman:"Be who you are, not who you are not!"
When I think about it, I might even have ended up getting banned. But that would not have been anything new, since I am already used to bans on Discord.
Fortunately, it never came to that, and so we are able to bring you this interesting interview with our guest.So, dear readers, enjoy the interview! 🎤📰 😄
1. After a nine-year break, you returned to eRevollution. How do you view the game today compared to the period when you were CP USA, a moderator, and one of the more well-known figures in the community?

The core mechanics may have evolved, but the fundamental essence of the game remains the same: it is, and always will be, about people, trust, and diplomacy. Returning after nine years feels both familiar and refreshing. While the pacing and some features are different, the strategic necessity of building strong alliances, maintaining clear communication, and respecting your partners hasn’t changed a bit.

2. You were once at the very top of American politics. Do you believe the experience you gained back then is still an advantage today, or has the game changed so much that everyone is essentially starting from scratch?

Experience is always an et, particularly when it comes to long-term vision, crisis management, and international diplomacy. Understanding how political blocks function and how to navigate complex regional dynamics doesn't expire. However, arrogance is a trap - if you rely solely on past achievements without adapting to the current meta and active community, you fail. So yes, experience gives you a foundation, but you still have to put in the work every single day.

3. Your country has as many as 50 regions, yet it appears that only 3-4 players are actually active. How do you explain that situation, and why do some smaller countries manage to maintain a much higher level of activity?

Territorial size on the map doesn't always correlate directly with active lation density, especially since the 50+ regions was something that eUSA always had and if memory serves me well, it was a motive of criticism by the players to the Admins for allowing USA to have so much. However, smaller nations often benefit from tighter communities where coordination happens naturally among a core group of highly dedicated veterans. For the eUSA, rebuilding our active player base and engagement is one of our primary internal goals. Having a large territorial footprint is a strategic challenge, but it also gives us a solid foundation to structure our growth moving forward.

4. How difficult is it to adapt after being away for nine years, especially considering that success in the game is not just about money, but also about people, organization, and experience?

It requires humility and active listening. You cannot simply jump back in and expect things to run on muscle memory from a decade ago. The learning curve regarding modern mechanics and new military structures takes a moment, but as you rightly pointed out, success in this game relies on organization and human relationships. Surrounding yourself with reliable team members and maintaining transparent communication with international allies makes the adaptation process smooth and effective.

5. Many veterans expect a certain level of respect when they return because of their past achievements. Do you think those accomplishments still carry weight, or does every player have to prove themselves all over again?

Past accomplishments earn you a seat at the table and initial recognition, but respect in the present must be earned through current actions. History gives context to who a player is, but leadership is demonstrated by what you deliver today for your country and your allies. You can respect a veteran's history while still holding them accountable to current standards. On the other hand … I do believe no one is worthy of more or less respect than I am, provided they keep a proper conduct.


6. During a discussion in the CP Residence Discord channel, you threatened to have me banned after I expressed my opinion to one of your congressmen. Do you believe that threats of sanctions contribute to healthy political debate, or do they reflect an intolerance of criticism?

You’re distorting the event quite a fair bit. While it is true you’ve expressed your opinion, you did so in Bosnian (correct me if I’m wrong on the language) language and my first approach was to ask both of you to speak in English. USA’s oficial language is english, therefore you should respect it and speak it while on USA’s server as I am sure you’d likely expect me to speak Bosnian (or whatever other language) if I went to your community server. Regardless … when I confronted you about it, you’ve tried to joke about it and say I should learn your language. Allow me to be clear on this: While I’m not opposed to learn a language when I’ve mastered a few myself and I may have been harsher than my usual given the proportionality of what happened, this was more about respect than anything.

7. Where do you draw the line between political conflict, free of speech, and behavior that, in your opinion, deserves sanctions?

Fre of speech allows for strong political opposition, heated debates, and tough negotiations. The line is crossed when dialogue shifts from political arguments to personal attacks, deliberate toxicity, or actions aimed at disrupting the platform itself. In diplomacy, you can fight fiercely over regions or treaty terms while maintaining mutual respect. Once respect is abandoned, it ceases to be politics and becomes unnecessary noise.

8. Today there are countries with only 7-8 active regions and around fifteen active players that achieve better results than much larger countries. In your opinion, what makes the difference between a successful and an unsuccessful country?

Efficiency, alignment, and clarity of purpose. A small nation with fifteen players who are fully coordinated, disciplined in their damage output, and aligned on diplomatic goals will consistently outperform a large, disorganized empire. Success isn't measured solely by map color; it’s measured by stability, economic resilience, and the strength of a country’s international commitments.

9. From your first period in the game, do you remember any player from eBosnia and Herzegovina, especially someone with whom you had political conflicts or serious disagreements?

I don’t recall any player from Bosnia with whom I’ve had conflicts or disagreements. I’ve had conflicts with players from other nations from opposing blocks back then but not particularly from Bosnia that I recall.


10. Recently, a well-known player returned to eVenezuela. Given that eVenezuela has often been ociated with accusations of using bots and multi-accounts throughout its history, do you believe those accusations had merit, or is it simply a reputation that has followed the country for years?

In eRevollution history, accusations regarding multi-accounts or bots have unfortunately been thrown around against many successful or highly active nations. As a former moderator, I prefer to rely on game mechanics, official administration checks, and concrete facts rather than community rumors or historical stigmas. Every returning player and nation deserves to be judged on their current gameplay and compliance with game rules. I’m not with this saying that there was a high percentage of multis in Venezuela or other countries. I’ve banned multis back then from both enemies and allies alike because when it comes to enforcing the rules, I didn’t care where you were from or how much money you’ve spent on the game, I’d still ban you on the spot if you broke the rules.

11. Finally, what would you like to say to players who know you only through stories and are now watching your return after nearly a decade away from the game?

To the new generation of players and those who only know my name from past articles: I’m not here to live off old stories. I returned because I love the strategic depth of this game and the international community behind it. My goal as President of the eUSA is to build stability, honor our word to our allies, and ensure our nation remains a reliable, respected power on the world map. Let’s make this chapter an exciting one.