I agree that the Romanian player base is larger in number and significantly more active than other groups.

However, that is precisely the core issue: when a game mode lacks structural controls, sheer numbers allow a single active group to dominate the bracket fill, leading directly to the systemic flaws we are seeing.

Imagine if UEFA structured the Champions League so that a single nation like England could enter 12 different teams into a tournament, allowed those teams to draw each other early on, and then stood by silently while half of them forfeited without playing a single minute just to march a favored club straight into the Finals.

In any real competitive sport—whether it's football, basketball, or professional esports—when there is a trophy, a prize pool, or real resources on the line, strict governance and regulatory frameworks are non-negotiable.

In top-tier football:

• Participant Limits per Nation: Regulations strictly cap how many clubs from a single country can qualify for major international tournaments. Even though England's Premier League is arguably the strongest league in the world and could legitimately claim it deserves even more slots than it currently gets based on raw quality—while smaller nations like Greece often end up with minimal to no automatic group-stage representation at all—UEFA still enforces hard caps to prevent regional monopolies and preserve global competitive integrity.

• Group & Matchmaking Restrictions: Explicit rules ensure teams from the same national ociation cannot be drawn against each other in early phases. This prevents tactical collusion, artificial free pes, or country-based match-fixing.

Some might view imposing strict entry limits or regional caps as "elitist" or overly restrictive to broader player participation. However, there is a fundamental difference between keeping a tournament open and leaving it completely unregulated. True accessibility shouldn't come at the cost of basic competitive integrity, nor should it serve as a shield for exploitation.

Of course, implementing these exact restrictions in Battle Arena presents a unique technical hurdle: because the game allows players to freely change their in-game nationality at will, traditional country-based matchmaking filters are extremely difficult to enforce and easy for bad actors to byp.

This inherent loophole is precisely why structural reform is so urgent. As Battle Arena is currently structured, it allows a concentrated bloc of players to flood a single bracket, face off against their own countrymates in 14 separate matches, and coordinate 10 zero-score forfeits to save thousands of Gold while boosting specific accounts into the top spots.

If developers cannot implement reliable, unexploitable matchmaking safeguards or anti-collusion regulations, then the mode cannot be fairly moderated—and should be removed entirely.

On a side note, I genuinely enjoy the fact that the more they speak, the more I start to understand why they hide behind the cat as puppets. Although the cat isn't the brightest, he at least has the minimum brainpower required to exploit a rigged game—something he's successfully pulled off a few times—unlike Undercover007, who unironically tried to frame a real, active fight against a Romanian player as evidence of me doing what they are doing.