Publicat in United States of America - Socializare și divertisment - 27 Oct 2026 10:21 - 1

Hello eRevollution citizens,
I have been reading the recent community feed and public discussions, but one specific post caught my attention and, quite frankly, should make every honest player stop and reflect.
Earlier today, **Titziano** brought forward a piece of evidence that is hard to ignore:
Titziano:
"Perm Banned acount ONLINE ! https://prnt.sc/O-ne6A72RyDR ADMIN at least make a little effort and use accounts that are not banned!!!!! f***ng moron... (official story : BOTS DO NOT EXIST in this game)"
Please take into consideration that this is the perspective of a single player analyzing public facts. This opinion only carries the weight you choose to give it; however, when evidence like this surfaces, we must discuss what it actually means for the integrity of our game.

The Illusion of "No Bots"
For a long time, the official stance or collective belief ped around has been simple: *"Bots do not exist in this game."*
Yet, when accounts marked as **Permanently Banned** suddenly pop up as **ONLINE** on the active users list, the narrative completely breaks down. We are left with only two logical explanations:
1. Automated Scripts Running on Dead Ss: Accounts that were supposedly removed from the active ecosystem are still executing background tasks, automated hits, or system interactions.
2. Administrative Oversight (or Direct Use): System-controlled entities or admin tools are operating through banned profile IDs without even troubling to hide their status.
Either scenario points to a glaring contradiction between what the community is told and what is actually happening behind the scenes.

Why Honest Players Should Care
When regular players log in daily, spend their hard-earned Gold, work their companies, and coordinate damage on the battlefield, they expect a level playing field.
If ghost accounts and banned profiles can still circulate, log online, or influence mechanics:
Market Fairness is Undermined: Automated presence alters supply, demand, and economic balance.
Battlefield Damage is Distorted: If phantom damage or automated hits can be triggered by inactive/banned accounts, military strategy becomes a farce against automated algorithms.
Political Integrity is Compromised: Any account capable of logging in is an account capable of being manipulated during critical electoral windows.

The Real Question Ahead
As Titziano sharply pointed out with a touch of dark humor: if you are going to use automated tools or background accounts, at least make the effort to cover the basic details!
We don't need arbitrary restrictions that punish active, honest players who just want to vote or fight. What we need is **transparency**. The player base deserves to know whether the game is being played by real human beings or by administrative ghosts.

What is my stance on the issue
I've read extensively about the use of bots by the Admins and I was also told that there was a protest some time ago precisely over this matter. My stance on the issue is simple:
1. If the Admin team uses bots to keep certain game modules alive as a necessity, that should be cleared out and transparently stated.
2. I'm not entirely against the use of bots as long as:
a) They are used only to keep certain modules alive with minimal mechanics influence.
b) The bots are removed if their necessity is somehow suppressed.
c) They are never used in the political module where decisions are made and their actions have a huge impact.
Say for example the Admins activate a network of bots to keep a certain game module open because there's not enough players to keep it open... In order to not cripple the game and ruin the fun for a select group of people that play the game, that's fine. But say all of a sudden new people join and this is no longer necessary? Then the bots should be decommissioned immediately.
Seeing that we can't verify the depth of influence the bots can have in the game, until the Administration addresses these blatant anomalies, the eUSA government will continue to strictly enforce its own independent clearance protocols. We cannot control what happens at the server level, but we *can* ensure that our borders, our parties, and our nation remains guarded against unverified entities.
This is all I have to say for now. Keep your eyes open!
Kind regards,
Signed,

A Concerned Citizen of the eWorld
Sustine
alt puiComentarii (1)

First Denied. I'm open to debate this.
