Publicat in Bosnia and Herzegovina - Analiză militară - 30 Oct 2025 08:48 - 3
Greetings to the citizens of eBiH and allies across
eRevollution,As the current President of eBiH, I’m presenting a clear proposal to improve the game’s war mechanics while preserving the strategic depth that real players have built over the years
Right now, AI players raise Resistance Wars everywhere. They shoot in every battle. The system breathes on its own—without orders, without coordination.
That’s acceptable—to a point.But if Airstrike is introduced as a new type of attack, there must be a clear boundary between system automation and player control.---🔧
Proposed Airstrike Mechanics:- Can only be launched by a country, not by AI.- Target must be a region not connected by land to the attacking country.- Cannot be used against neighboring countries.-
To activate, the country must have: - 100,000 CC in the national treasury - 300,000 food in the treasury- Cooldown: 7 days between Airstrikes---🛡️ AI’s Role in This System:- AI can defend a region targeted by Airstrike.
- AI can raise RW after a region is occupied.- But AI must not launch Airstrikes — this tool belongs to leaders.---🎁 Special Event WeaponI also propose the introduction of a special weapon available only through events. This weapon:
- Cannot be sold, gifted, or transferred.
- Can be used in both ground and air battles.- Has no limit on number of hits, but cannot be obtained outside of events.
- Rewards active players while keeping the economy balanced.---🎯 Why This MattersAirstrike must remain a strategic decision, not an automated reaction.
It should carry weight, require preparation, and reflect political responsibility. It must be a tool for those who plan, lead, and answer to their people.
If AI already spreads across every region, then Airstrike should remain the last weapon reserved for human leadership — where algorithms cannot reach.
---And one personal note:
I’ve had a Discord mute for many years — not because I’m silent, but because I speak directly. I don’t sugarcoat, I don’t play diplomatic games when the battlefield demands clarity.
But that doesn’t stop me from thinking, proposing, and leading.
For eBiH. For balance. For a game that respects strategy.
Bosman, CP of eBiH
eRevollution,As the current President of eBiH, I’m presenting a clear proposal to improve the game’s war mechanics while preserving the strategic depth that real players have built over the years
Right now, AI players raise Resistance Wars everywhere. They shoot in every battle. The system breathes on its own—without orders, without coordination.
That’s acceptable—to a point.But if Airstrike is introduced as a new type of attack, there must be a clear boundary between system automation and player control.---🔧
Proposed Airstrike Mechanics:- Can only be launched by a country, not by AI.- Target must be a region not connected by land to the attacking country.- Cannot be used against neighboring countries.-
To activate, the country must have: - 100,000 CC in the national treasury - 300,000 food in the treasury- Cooldown: 7 days between Airstrikes---🛡️ AI’s Role in This System:- AI can defend a region targeted by Airstrike.
- AI can raise RW after a region is occupied.- But AI must not launch Airstrikes — this tool belongs to leaders.---🎁 Special Event WeaponI also propose the introduction of a special weapon available only through events. This weapon:
- Cannot be sold, gifted, or transferred.
- Can be used in both ground and air battles.- Has no limit on number of hits, but cannot be obtained outside of events.
- Rewards active players while keeping the economy balanced.---🎯 Why This MattersAirstrike must remain a strategic decision, not an automated reaction.
It should carry weight, require preparation, and reflect political responsibility. It must be a tool for those who plan, lead, and answer to their people.
If AI already spreads across every region, then Airstrike should remain the last weapon reserved for human leadership — where algorithms cannot reach.
---And one personal note:
I’ve had a Discord mute for many years — not because I’m silent, but because I speak directly. I don’t sugarcoat, I don’t play diplomatic games when the battlefield demands clarity.
But that doesn’t stop me from thinking, proposing, and leading.
For eBiH. For balance. For a game that respects strategy.
Bosman, CP of eBiH
Sustine
Kame Sennin
